/
24.10.2015 at 12:00 am
Cuttings

Salomon v Salomon is Antiquated

Our courts shouldn't apply Salomon v Salomon so strictly.

I've seen injustice done beacuse the courts hold on too dearly to the authorities made in Salomon's wake.

All the more so with companies whose sole shareholders are also its sole directors, and where the companies are just legal vessels as a front, rather than a genuine use of the separate entity principle.

Some reasons:

  1. That case is antiquated. It's 119 years old. It doesn't account for the sophisticated and wrongful acts knowingly perpetrated by directors/shareholders in modern times.

  2. It's unsuited to Malaysia. I know people who avoid doing business with Malaysians whenever they can. Business here is too relationship-based (which is the same anywhere, but our law enforcement is particularly weak), and contracting parties don't always honour their contracts (much less gentlemen's agreements).

  3. Legal fiction is not reality. Businessfolk cheat sometimes. And a defence based on the separate legal personality of companies is a defence based on a fundamental legal fiction, which when applied carelessly, enables cheating.


Filed under:
#
Words: 176 words approx.
Time to read: 0.70 mins (at 250 wpm)
Keywords:
, , , , , , , , ,

Other suggested posts

  1. 20.06.2022 at 01:56 pm / Cultists of Science
  2. 25.08.2020 at 08:42 am / Triple Buffered Painters
  3. 29.08.2018 at 11:06 am / Damascus Differences
  4. 17.12.2017 at 12:00 am / To Know C
  5. 06.10.2015 at 12:00 am / Subservient/Servile Written Malay
  6. 12.07.2015 at 12:00 am / José Mujica's Humility
  7. 31.05.2015 at 12:00 am / Judges Should Not Fear Criticism
  8. 05.07.2014 at 12:00 am / Jack Hamm on (Artistic) Practice
  9. 08.11.2013 at 12:00 am / Red Riding Hood's Examination-in-Chief
© Wan Zafran. See disclaimer.