/
27.04.2020 at 07:11 pm
Cuttings

How Science Should Be

Sticking to the science.

Funny that I should find this succinct definition on scientific exploration/discussion from a Reddit thread concerning Zahi Hawass:

... It would be nice if, just for once, we could have a discussion about this social science that addresses: here's what we have observed; here is how we observed it; here's our conclusions; here's how we derived those conclusions; here's what is limited about our conclusions; here's what we don't yet know; here's what I think happened; here's what we still have to observe; here's what we should look for next time we do a study on this topic; etc.

Much like the idea that a mature mind requires that you be able to entertain others' thoughts without having to accept it, consider this:

... If you can't entertain another person's ideas and beliefs, you don't truly know the argument.

Filed under:
#
Words: 151 words approx.
Time to read: 0.60 mins (at 250 wpm)
Keywords:
, , , , , , , , ,

Other suggested posts

  1. 31.07.2022 at 10:08 pm / Hades And (Non-Ending) Desk Jobs
  2. 18.06.2022 at 06:52 pm / Strangling Deeds
  3. 08.06.2022 at 04:13 pm / Counsel vs Client Perspectives
  4. 22.08.2020 at 05:49 pm / Decoding Code Specimens
  5. 14.03.2020 at 09:18 pm / Sheets for People
  6. 08.12.2017 at 12:00 am / The Song of Java Braces
  7. 06.09.2015 at 12:00 am / Big Illegal Guns
  8. 04.07.2012 at 12:00 am / When To Not Use Data Structures/Algorithms
  9. 16.03.2012 at 12:00 am / Sentient Vocal Directives
  10. 16.08.2010 at 12:00 am / You Have Reason
© Wan Zafran. See disclaimer.