/
27.04.2020 at 07:11 pm
Cuttings

How Science Should Be

Sticking to the science.

Funny that I should find this succinct definition on scientific exploration/discussion from a Reddit thread concerning Zahi Hawass:

... It would be nice if, just for once, we could have a discussion about this social science that addresses: here's what we have observed; here is how we observed it; here's our conclusions; here's how we derived those conclusions; here's what is limited about our conclusions; here's what we don't yet know; here's what I think happened; here's what we still have to observe; here's what we should look for next time we do a study on this topic; etc.

Much like the idea that a mature mind requires that you be able to entertain others' thoughts without having to accept it, consider this:

... If you can't entertain another person's ideas and beliefs, you don't truly know the argument.

Filed under:
#
Words: 151 words approx.
Time to read: 0.60 mins (at 250 wpm)
Keywords:
, , , , , , , , ,

Other suggested posts

  1. 19.12.2024 at 09:00 pm / You Yearn, Yet Engage Not
  2. 18.10.2022 at 09:36 am / The Airplane Test of Fluency
  3. 13.08.2020 at 09:05 pm / Twitter Inspires Carmack
  4. 14.01.2020 at 01:24 pm / Third Time's A Charm
  5. 11.01.2019 at 06:39 pm / Clarity of Liskov
  6. 07.12.2017 at 12:00 am / A Reputation Without Oil
  7. 03.12.2017 at 12:00 am / Declarative, Imperative, Functional Sandwiches
  8. 21.12.2015 at 12:00 am / Emails and English Weather
  9. 02.04.2012 at 12:00 am / Abstract Wall Painting
  10. 17.03.2012 at 12:00 am / Upper and Lower Hengsha
© Wan Zafran. See disclaimer.