/
27.04.2020 at 07:11 pm
Cuttings

How Science Should Be

Sticking to the science.

Funny that I should find this succinct definition on scientific exploration/discussion from a Reddit thread concerning Zahi Hawass:

... It would be nice if, just for once, we could have a discussion about this social science that addresses: here's what we have observed; here is how we observed it; here's our conclusions; here's how we derived those conclusions; here's what is limited about our conclusions; here's what we don't yet know; here's what I think happened; here's what we still have to observe; here's what we should look for next time we do a study on this topic; etc.

Much like the idea that a mature mind requires that you be able to entertain others' thoughts without having to accept it, consider this:

... If you can't entertain another person's ideas and beliefs, you don't truly know the argument.


Filed under:
#
Words: 151 words approx.
Time to read: 0.60 mins (at 250 wpm)
Keywords:
, , , , , , , , ,

Other suggested posts

  1. 11.06.2022 at 07:24 am / Vampiric Pathology
  2. 10.06.2022 at 07:44 pm / Teach Thy Tongue to Say: 'I Do Not Know'
  3. 27.08.2020 at 09:33 pm / Write Like You Play Tetris
  4. 27.04.2020 at 07:11 pm / How Science Should Be
  5. 29.01.2020 at 10:48 am / Code & Shame
  6. 08.12.2017 at 12:00 am / The Song of Java Braces
  7. 12.07.2015 at 12:00 am / José Mujica's Humility
  8. 05.07.2014 at 12:00 am / Jack Hamm on (Artistic) Practice
  9. 08.12.2013 at 12:00 am / Alien Blue Entrances
  10. 14.04.2012 at 12:00 am / Ghostly Portal
© Wan Zafran. See disclaimer.